1:45 PM / Wednesday April 17, 2024

29 Jan 2016

Judge denies counsel withdrawl from Fattah racketeering case

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
January 29, 2016 Category: Week In Review Posted by:

ABOVE PHOTO:  U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah, D-Pa., top center, speaks outside of the federal courthouse, Tuesday, Aug. 18, 2015, in Philadelphia. Fattah has been indicted on charges he misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars of federal, charitable and campaign funds. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Congressman’s four criminal lawyers ask judge to quit the case because they aren’t being paid.

By Maryclaire Dale

Associated Press

A federal judge warned U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah to rethink his priorities on Tuesday after the congressman said he was more concerned about raising money for his re-election than he was paying the lawyers represnting him in his upcoming racketeering trial.    

Fattah’s defense team asked to be released from the case because the four lawyers weren’t being paid. The complex fraud trial is set for trial on May 2. Fattah, an 11-term Democrat, is accused of accepting bribes and misusing nonprofit funds and government grants.

U.S. Disrict Judge Harvey Bartle III called Fattah’s decision to prioritize fund-raising for his reelection campaign above paying his lawyers “particularly unfair”, according to a story in Wednesday’s Philadelphia Inquirer, but denied a request from his defense team to withdraw from the case due to nonpayment of fees.

Although they hadn’t been paid in months, Judge Bartle said that the lawyers were aware of the time and financial commitments when they agreed to take the case. That they didn’t require the Philadelphia Democrat to pay their legal fees up front was a risk they chose to take, Bartle wrote in the opinion announcing his decision.

Allowing Fattah to take time to retain new counsel would likely delay his trial, scheduled for May 2 by months, the judge said.

“It is very late in the game for counsel to be seeking to pull out of this case,” Bartle wrote, adding later: “This ship cannot be turned around easily.”

“It’s a little like holding (the defense lawyers) and the court hostage,’’ Bartle said. “I have no control over when this hypothetical new attorney would show up.’’

The defense lawyers offered to stay on for another week or two until Fattah retained someone else. They said they had prepped the case for trial and thought another firm could step right in, the 900,000 pages of government evidence notwithstanding.

But while he didn’t give the lawyers the exit they sought, he also cautioned Fattah, telling the Congressman “You need to take this matter seriously and think long and hard about your priorities.”

Noting his $174,000 congressional salary, the judge said Fattah was hardly “a pauper’’ who could get a public defender.

Fattah said he has spent more than $300,000 during the nearly nine-year FBI investigation, including $100,000 on his current lawyers, who came on board after the July indictment. But he complained the government has spent millions pursuing him.

Fattah, 59, said he hoped to retain a larger firm that can accept delayed payments.

“As I stand here, I’m innocent,’’ Fattah said. “I’m not seeking any delay. … But I have to get past a couple challenges, including my re-election.’’

Asked about his real estate holdings, Fattah told the judge he co-owns a vacation home in the Poconos, but said his TV-anchor wife has sole ownership of their family home. He said his wife, Renee Chenault-Fattah, owned the home before they married.

A somewhat related case last year ensnared the congressman’s son, Chaka Fattah Jr., who was convicted of bank and tax fraud but calls himself “collateral damage’’ in the FBI’s probe of his father.

As a Democrat in a safely Democratic district, Fattah has not had to stockpile cash to fight off primary opponents in the past, but there are several Democrats challenging him this year. Campaign finance reports show that he has taken in just $13,500 since the July indictment, compared to the $69,000 and $72,000 in the previous two quarters.

It was not immediately clear how much he had in any separate legal defense funds. A spokeswoman did not immediately return a message. Federal lawmakers can use campaign funds for legal bills as long as the allegations stem from their campaign or their official duties.

“It’s difficult to understand why his legal bills should be paid with other peoples’ money,’’ Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric L. Gibson argued Tuesday.

But Fattah said the Justice Department was also funded by other people.

“I’m not the first elected official to have a legal fund. I’m sorry he has a problem with that,’’ Fattah said.

Philadelphia Inquirer contributed to this article.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Leave a Comment

Recent News

Philly NAACP

April 14, 2024

March 17, 2024

Tweet Email Tweet Email Related Posts Philadelphia Judicial Primary Candidates At A Glance Guide Philadelphia Judicial Candidates...


Hank Aaron rose above racist hate mail and threats in pursuit of Ruth’s home run record 50 years ago

April 14, 2024

Tweet Email ABOVE PHOTO: Hank Aaron holds aloft the ball he hit for his 715th career home...


Mental health and the ALS community

April 13, 2024

Tweet Email BPTSponsored by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America, Inc. (MTPA) Each year, an estimated 5,000-6,000 Americans are...

Election 2024

Federal data does not show a soaring number of unauthorized migrants registering to vote

April 14, 2024

Tweet Email ABOVE PHOTO: SCREEN SHOT By Melissa GoldinASSOCIATED PRESS CLAIM Social Security Administration data shows the...

Color Of Money

Five financial tips to take your business to the next level

April 5, 2024

Tweet Email BPTBy Irana Wasti, chief product officer at BILL Building a business is an incredible journey,...


Jump start the spring season by getting vaccinated against this potentially serious lung disease

April 5, 2024

Tweet Email BPT Spring is the season of new beginnings — a time when we can finally...

The Philadelphia Sunday Sun Staff